All of the crap about ANSWER amuses me.
When the OSS had to pick whom to arm, they asked ONE question: will you fight the enemy?
So they armed the French Communists, armed, trained and advised the Italian Communists, Yugoslav Communists, Greek Communists, Spanish Republicans and anyone else who would pick up a weapon.
When they tried to arm the Yugoslav royalists and found they were more interested in killing communists and cutting deals with the Germans, they stopped arming them. Simple as that.
Why? Because they wanted to win the war.
The fact is that ANSWER gets the permits, deals with the cops, provides the parade marshalls and does all the scut work. Bitching about their politics or their speakers is like complaining about free beer. You take what they give you or you buy your own.
You want a more centrist message, do what they do and pay for it. You don't like their speakers, get better ones. Don't like the way they do things, do them better yourself.
But don't sit around and piss and moan about the organizers when you're not doing what they do, which is organizing, large and effective protests.
The question Kos and everyone else who doesn't like ANSWER needs to ask is this: do you want to protest US policy in Iraq?
Then you need to either do one of three things: form your own groups and enact you own strategies, join ANSWER and moderate it's message from the inside, or stop your bitching and go to the protests, looking at the larger issue.
Now, in looking over the coverage of the protests, everyone ignored the boilerplate speeches and talked to the protesters. Which is a good thing. And protests matter. You get 300,000 people in the street, in the bitter cold, that sends a message.
No one can ignore that, even if the Bushies are trying like hell to do so.
So for everyone who thinks ANSWER is a problem, you're free to do your own thing.
Posted by steve gilliard at January 21, 2003 10:10 AM
. . .
Are marches icky? Yeah. Full of newbies who are too green, and lifers who are overripe, and people who are off-topic, and people who think "it's about me". The speeches are drivel, and it's usually too hot, or too cold, or too muggy, or too buggy, or you get beaten half to death, or the Big Game is on TV. Icky. Most of MLK's actions were even ickier.
Do marches work? Yeah. (Funny you should question that on MLK Day.) Usually not in a "walls came tumbling down" kinda way, but yeah. "Social proof" is incredibly powerful ... humans are more likely to entertain an idea if they see others act on it. Networking is powerful. Information-sharing is powerful. And from where we stand today (a rare confluence of forces, I admit) energetic public disapproval might tip the scales and stop the war before it starts!
Are the loonies in charge? Great! There's more adminisitrivia to these events than you imagine. Glad somebody else jumped up and did the part I don't like. Loonies fade into background as mainstreamers arrive, and (unlike neo-con's pandering to neo-seg's) nobody goes there to court the loony vote.
Doesn't that endorse the loony agenda? No, no, no ... and they're not asking you to. Besides, that question's been beaten to death for months (probably by better hand-wringers than you). To answer the ANSWER question, check with progressive labor's Max or libertaria's Jim -- they've done the agonizing so you don't have to.
Could you do something more effective with your time? Great! Go! Do!
Get your "national brand" signage (hardcopy, jpg, etc.) here.
Connect with your neighbors at United for Peace. It's a "big tent" umbrella organization. (It's not about "control", but while you were out, saner heads did take the lead.) Sure, you can find people there you disagree with, but if you can't find like-minded people there, well, it's not them -- it's you.
Posted by RonK, Seattle at January 21, 2003 01:45 PM