View Story | 1021 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
when it comes to religion or lack thereof. Being so damned sure you are right and everyone who disagrees with you is wrong, is off-putting, arrogant and obnoxious. And I am decidedly secular Wiccan. I believe what I believe for reasons that make sense tome personally but don't come near meeting the level necessary for objective proof; it's purely a subjective belief.
Militant--ahteists or religious--make me tired.
The last time we mixed religion and politics people got burned at the stake.
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:06:11 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
even if you don't like it. I am a recovering born-again, currently do not believe in any personal God who meddles in our miniutia, and I get tired of non-believers being treated like kooks, as you must also have experience with.
Athiests have had NO place at any table in this country and still cannot run for much more than city council in a large urban area. So it just might be time for militance, like women had to do in the 60's and 70's.
by karenc13 on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:18:42 AM PDT
as an "Athiest of all gods", but I am just as militant about oceanstar17's rights to believe and IW rights to be a witch.
However, where it gets tricky, at least in this society is it is okay for a church to have a sign out front saying "Jesus will lead the way" or some such thing, but if I have a sign that says "Atheist believe in themselves" or the like, I am the one pushing my beliefs on others.
McCain and Lobbyists; McCain on NAFTA
by ETinKC on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:24:40 AM PDT
IF the sign is on private property. I back the rights of atheists to post Festivus signs on public proeprty if CHristians get to pale religiosu symbols there.
BUT bad behavior--rudenes, deprecatign other people's beleifs--is still bad behavior, whoever does it. I dislike anyoen who wakes me up on Sat.morning--atheist or Christian. And I wouldn't be happy if the Secualr Humanist Society has a sign on public school property advertising their meetings any more than I was when a local church which rents space in the school for SUnday services had a large permanent sign ther e(it's been moved across the street to private property; someone other than I called, I suspect).
Rudneess and snottiness is rudeness and snottiness whatever the beelif system.
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:35:56 AM PDT
by Indexer on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:38:22 AM PDT
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:06:48 PM PDT
Great diary, Irish witch, and another reminder that all fundamentalism -- Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, etc. -- is essentiality the same religion. They may differ in their rituals and the name they call God, but they all share the same underlying philosophy of fear and hatred of that which is not like themselves.
McCain: Running for Hoover's 21st term
by Finck II on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 05:08:48 AM PDT
and can't think of the last time I ever heard of an Atheist going door to door... (except this one guy who did it to prove a point, there was a you tube video at some point). And I don't actual have any signs on my house 9except for the lighted peace sign which my neighbor keeps refering to as a broken cross.
As you know, it gets tough to be a non xtian this time of year. I never correct someone who says Merry Christmas to me, or even God bless, but if I wish them Happy Solstice back, then I am waging war on xtianity.
p.s. did you really meant to tr me for that comment?
by ETinKC on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:41:56 AM PDT
ESPECIALLY in small-town America. But it doesn't justify rudeness on my behalf--and trust me, there's opportunity for it every time I leave the house. No, you odn't go door to door. But I ahve run across atheists every bit as obnoxious ont he Net iand in RL as any fundy.
Basically two wrongs don'tmake a right.
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:06:34 PM PDT
..I'm just curious: Is something wrong with your keyboard? Your posts, at first glance, resembled those examples in the diary, until I realized you're probably typing too fsat ro yuor kyeboard is fubar!
(¯`*._(¯`*._(-IMPEACH-)_.*´¯)_.*´¯) It's not too late!
by nehark on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:25:42 PM PDT
And the inability of soem folks here--Christian and athist--tor ecognize their arrogance annoys me,.
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:38:20 PM PDT
;-)
by nehark on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 03:47:34 PM PDT
that others have to recognise their arrogance when in reality they are merely holding different views and then expressing them in discussion
sounds awfully like differing views are arrogant, same views as yours are humble
No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 04:24:46 PM PDT
at all - guess tone can be lost on the nets.
by ETinKC on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:25:05 PM PDT
expression of thsoe views. It is the way in which they chosoe to express them--which is oftentiems rude and insulting to thsoe who disagree (on all sides)--and that is where the arrognace comes in. Arrognace is an attiude expressed through ACTIONS. And hte ACTIONS are rude and arrogant on bioth sides, in soem cases. Can't you see THAT? I condemned CHristians as much as atheists--and their views are far mroe differeing formmine than atheism is.
by irishwitch on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 12:45:40 PM PDT
I odn't give as hit what ANYOIEN beleive4s--it's how they ACT htat bothers me. That applies to atheists, WIccans, Christians, Buddhsits, agnostics, and members of every philosophy. Treat others with respect, and you deserve respect. Sling names and insutls around--wheter because of your beleif system or your atheism--and I will call you onbad behaviopr.
Bad behavior is done by members of all faiths anphilopshies.
by irishwitch on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 12:48:08 PM PDT
talk...
Anyway, it's the message that counts, not the letters.
Thou shalt not kill except for a long list of good reasons is like saying you should not covet your neighbor's wife unless she's hot.
by FudgeFighter on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:22:02 PM PDT
I'm not in the broom closet. But I've gotten in the habit of wearing my pentacle under my shirt.
by Puck Goodfellow on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:39:01 PM PDT
If you are going to wear a religious symbol you believe in, do so proudly. Or, what's the point?
by My Philosophy on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 03:14:39 PM PDT
as a proud and out witch, you will be not perscuted, but ostracized.
Numerous ancedotes about pagans who were outed or out who were denied jobs, fired from jobs, etc.
One company were I worked and was out- the office manager told me that the five evangelical christians were offended by my goddess pendant(nile river goddess, abstract woman figure arms raised holding a moonstone above her head, nothing overtly pagany) It was a general comment, and she just brought it up, and I was all ready to say okay, I will not wear it.
Luckily, one of the VPs who was also evangelical christian was sitting in the lunchroom with us spoke up and said something like, "I am suprised that Rowan is so tolerant of us wearing what amounts to a torture device that has been used as a symbol to justify all sorts of atrocities, including perscution of pagans." Then he said, "if Rowan has to take off her religious symbol, then we need to make it an office policy that no religious symbols are to be tolerated, it's all or nothing,
I think I kind of fell in love that day.
by rowanleigh on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 06:20:00 PM PDT
I love hearing stories like that. Restores my optimism.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. - George Orwell
by kyril on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:46:58 PM PDT
Something to pull out if you see a pagan wearing another pentacle, or get into a conversation with someone who might be a fellow pagan.
Looking for intelligent energy policy alternatives? Try here.
by alizard on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 12:04:26 AM PDT
God and the afterlife.
We don't know.
Now, beliefs - there be plenty. But knowledge is beyond scarce.
I personally believe that when I die, I'll go to a place where every thought I choose to animate will become corporeal reality. Makes me happy. And no one else has to believe it.
Change the media ownership laws and reinstate the Fairness Doctrine
by moosely2006 on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 04:01:14 PM PDT
and for that reason it is a matter of faith, or not . . .
"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually." James Baldwin
by zdefender on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 10:42:05 PM PDT
...who wish me a Merry Christmas.
But the real question is: titanium alloy Festivus poles - innovation or heresy?
9-11 changed everything? Well, Katrina changed it back.
by varro on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:22:54 PM PDT
I forgive your blasphemy, but will mention in during the Airing of Grievances.
i am jack's complete lack of surprise -- fight club
by bustacap on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:40:20 PM PDT
Those Maoists probably sneak lead into them like they put lead into everything else. Festivus is NOT a Falun Gong holiday - why do they need to poison us?
by varro on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:04:31 PM PDT
You're surely not prepared for the Feats of Strength.
"Cynicism is a sorry wisdom." - Barack Obama
by BlueGenes on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:47:52 PM PDT
chose Aluminum, so it was written, specifically for its high strength-to-weight ratio. As titanium is stronger and lighter than Aluminum, it should be acceptable.
Festivus for the rest of us!!!
Al Qeada is a faith-based initiative.
by drewfromct on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:42:31 PM PDT
...NO ONE gets gifts until someone gets pinned. :D
Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.
by FishBiscuit on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:40:27 PM PDT
as it is not really a Christian holiday anymore. Society has pretty much stripped it of any religious connotation. I usually just reciprocate the comment...but if given the opportunity, I will explain my own beliefs. I just don't think it is worth the headache of arguing with every Christian about the (lack of) meaning in the contemporary incarnation Christmas.
Just to note, I too am an atheist, sometimes I call myself an anti-theist. Though I am careful with the words I use.
by cardboardurinal on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:46:50 PM PDT
would dispute the lack of meaning in the contemporary incarnations of Xmas...
John McCain is your jalopy
by Buffalo Girl on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:34:18 PM PDT
Christmas is what we happen to call ours.
by alizard on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 12:06:12 AM PDT
I am not a Christian but I definitely believe in Christmas..... Who can argue with 'Peace on Earth, goodwill to men' and the spirit of giving?
by CanadaWest on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 03:22:29 PM PDT
We had to break our daughter of her habit of replying that "we don't celebrate Christmas because we're Jewish" to every shop clerk, waitress, etc.
She was little - 6 to 7 years - at the time, and I explained that the people were just being nice. By replying with the "don't celebrate Christmas" she was extending the encounter and almost inviting them to debate her.
When actually, their "Merry Christmas" was just automatic, a December version of "y'all come back"
Yes. There ARE progressive Democrats in Alabama. Visit with us at Left in Alabama
by countrycat on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:55:14 PM PDT
I live among a lotta Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims. Some of them wish ME a Merry Christmas....and I'm an agnostic ( " we don't know and we don't care!")but I'm still on my wife to come clean to the kids about Santa Claus before they get the shit embarrassed outta themselves at school....and I tell em to ask their mom about Jesus and all that Jazz when they ask ( 11 years of Catholic school and what did they do? Turn me into an agnostic...they do emphasize critical reading after all...)and anyway my doc, who happens to be Jewish, suggested I go to the movies Christmas day if I'm bored. So I took up his advice and went to a 3 pm show one Christmas. He laughed and said perfect, you shoulda gone out for Chinese food afterwards...and hey the movie was packed, so I guess a lot of people don't celebrate...i think your daughter sounded incredibly cute, i've got a little spitfire of my own...damn just noticed you are in Alabama...now that has to be kinda tough. I know Atlanta and environs has lots of diversity but don't know much about the "Bumminham" area if that's where you're at.I remember being at a pig roast down south back in 82 and the subject of religion came up and us three jersey guys got them riled up because we were Catholic, except for my buddy Larry, who calmly informed them he was a Jew...dudes had to stop and think on it for a second. Incredibly, they passed us some moonshine and let us hang out.
by jerseydan on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 04:12:14 PM PDT
But it's okay if our daughter points out that we're Jewish -- I think it's good for people to know there's a diversity of belief and practice. So long as she says thank you and is friendly and polite, I think it's fine. Reading this just gave me an idea -- maybe next time someone says Merry Christmas, I'll answer "Happy Hannukah!" Of course, can't do it this year since Hannukah is over 2 weeks before Christmas!
If, in our efforts to win, we become as dishonest as our opponents on the right, we don't deserve to triumph.
by Tamar on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 04:50:45 PM PDT
walks around with a pocket full of candy canes. Every time somebody says Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, Happy Holidays, whatever, he hands them one. He sometimes even gives it to them just for the heck of it, and always to cashiers this time of year. He always gets a great big smile in return.
by HugoDog on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 07:36:40 PM PDT
I might just take that one up.
-fred
by Fred Fnord on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:18:59 PM PDT
the nice couple at my local kiosk a Happy Ramadan. I am not Muslim but it is a gesture of kindness and friendship in wishing all the good things about a respective religion's holidays on the practitioners. I mean, getting right down to it, they all have family, love, kindness, and charity as their core principles. What's not to love about that?
They also loved my Thanksgiving soup, and wished me well for my own (secular) holiday.
It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather...
by Jeffersonian Democrat on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 03:06:30 AM PDT
and proved a point i think we all agree with: that No One likes being woken up by prostelytizers(religious or otherwise), especially on weekends.
The guy in that video was going around some city in Utah, I believe in direct response to the disproportionality of Mormons going door-to-door.
by BlueGenes on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:46:21 PM PDT
it's not the Mormons, it's the Jehovah's Witnesses that show up unannounced and uninvited and leave their literature all over my porch if I'm not home (drives me crazy, all the trees they're killing printing their propaganda). That's what I get for being mannerly to them once.
"In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." - H. L. Mencken
by SueDe on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 05:19:40 AM PDT
wishes, I wish you a joyous winter holiday of your religous or non religous faith too is too long to say at the local shopmart checkout line?
Is that why I get such bizarre looks here in the hinterlands of Northern MN?
by rowanleigh on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 06:11:34 PM PDT
Glad tidings. One stress point removed for you. :)
Against silence, which is slavery. -- Czeslaw Milosz
by Caneel on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 03:30:56 PM PDT
While I didn't like it when the Boy Scouts insisted that their members & leaders have to believe in god and that they can't be gay, I also believe that as a private organization they have a right to their beliefs and rules. My problem with them is that they are often sponsored by public schools, given free use of facilities in public places, and given free publicity by schools. If Boy Scouts take a religious stand, then I think they should be treated like any other religious organization. In contrast, the Girl Scouts make no statement about peoples' private religious beliefs or sexual orientation (altho' god is mentioned in the pledge, but the girls aren't required to say that part). Religious freedom is just that. Freedom to be religious, to choose your religion, or to choose no religion. It's pretty sad that virtually all of our national politicians are afraid admit to questioning religion. I'm sure that not all of them really believe in god.
by Tamar on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 04:38:04 PM PDT
Rudeness is sometimes necessary.
And I'll continue to be rude.
From everything I know of the universe and the way it operates, there is no such thing as the supernatural.
I'll repeat that, there is no such thing as the supernatural.
No deities, gods, angels, demons, ghosts, djinns, avatars, witches, warlocks, etc. No telekinesis, telepathy, remote viewing, dowsing, spoonbending, spell-casting, voodoo dolls, etc.
It is all lies we tell to ourselves and perpetuate through our children at the expense of our sanity and our society.
So the day I live in a rational society where people give up all the bullshit, I'll quit being rude.
I have little tolerance for those who live in a dream world they have been taught to believe, yet never once questioned.
"The chief weapon of the sea pirates was their capacity to astonish." Kurt Vonnegut
by Thorby Baslim on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 05:12:35 PM PDT
I've never seen a ghost, nor have I ever heard a voice speaking to me out of burning bushes, but I am willing to concede that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Absence of evidence is suggestive of absence, but you can't be absolutely sure. You might as well have an island covered in white sheep, and then no matter how thoroughly you comb the island, you will never find a black sheep - and then you could conclude that black sheep don't exist, but it wouldn't be safe because all you've done is comb that island.
Consider the island as the collective experience of all the people who have never witnessed any kind of supernatural phenomena. (And I'll be on it with you.) But all we really know is that we haven't witnessed it. We cannot say that it doesn't happen.
Sure, let's live our day-to-day lives as though the supernatural does not exist. No evidence, right? Why bother? But let's not make a falsifiable statement, either, in the total lack of evidence.
J.S. McCain III: "Forget the promise of progress and understanding, for in our grim, dark future there is only war."
by Shaviv on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 07:05:24 PM PDT
When someone tries to engage me in same. I usually reply, "In an infinite universe, surely there is infinite possibility," and let it go at that.
IMHO, there's no definitive evidence one way or the other, so why go on? There are many, much more interesting questions to consider.
And I do like Christmas! I treat it as a nothern festival predating Christianity. Since I was born in a four season territory (NYC), I like all the solstice celebrations. Like another poster said, " ... what's wrong with peace on earth?"
by jakbeau on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 07:34:05 PM PDT
it is mountains of scientific evidence that such things are not possible and ZERO plausible testable theories put forward to show that they are in any way possible
with no hard evidence, no sustainable mechanism for them to be possible
this is why people resort to simplistic dumb analogies - because it shows how weak the argument is
Dawkins gets a hard time for his flying spaghetti monster argument - but EVERY argument you make is equally valid for the existence of a superheroic flying spaghetti monster calling the shots
it doesn't mean that such a monster should be given equal weight in debate for the countless massive amounts of stuff that is testable, and tested
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:20:02 PM PDT
Huh? First off, the very fact that you use words like "mountains", "zero", "not possible" and "EVERY argument you could make" in your statements means you don't think logically or like a scientist.
Second, interesting how you lump ANYTHING you don't seem to believe in into the category "such things". What in the world is "such things", and how is it valid to lump them all into one category? I mean, telepathy is the same thing as religion? Talk about your sweeping, emotional, unsupportable statements.
So "every argument you could make" now or at any point in the future (wait, are you saying you know what people are going to say in the future? That would be predicting the future, wouldn't it?), is ALREADY "equally" valid? Haven't you ever heard of the scientific method? Did we have a world-wide vote that I somehow missed, where everyone agreed they were "equal" in "all" cases?
You and Thorby may or may not be right (o.k., only Thorby might be right, because he only made ONE sweeping, unprovable statement), but you are both being intellectually dishonest.
by jkilkullen on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:46:13 PM PDT
i AM a scientist - so i clearly think like a scientist
the fact i use those words are because this is hardly a scientific forum or a robust debate with citations and the rest
the body of scientific knowledge is vast and varied
and it has yet to be shown to allow for the supernatural claims of religion
just claiming something is so because it's written in a book or you were told it by a guy in a dog collar and frock coat is nothing like as rigorous and does not merit equal standing in a debate
the rest of your posting is rambling and incoherent
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:04:08 PM PDT
faith is belief in things not seen, not proven, believed in the face of lack of evidence. . .
by zdefender on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 10:44:33 PM PDT
that is exactly what it is - yet to express that one has rejected it for these very reasons leads one to be accused of arrogance or militant atheism
we live in a society where you get extra credit for not showing your working
if you base your belief system on faith in an unprovable superstitious explanation you are given protection for those views not afforded to those who base their belief system on the absence of superstitious explanations
this is a torturous misapplication of the first amendment but what we are forced to live with
do many atheists find it ridiculous that many monotheists seem proud of the fact that their belief system is based on nothing but taking the word for it from some unelected authority figure about the interpretation of an old ambiguous text? yes almost certainly
is that arrogant or inappropriate?
certainly a lot less so than the belief held my large swathes of this country that for their lack of this superstitious belief system the lives of atheists are worth less - that they deserve some sort of eternal punishment for this
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:27:38 PM PDT
with nothing but white sheep and I had never seen a black sheep and only had the rumor of black sheep on other islands, I could accept the possibility of black sheep, because I know about white sheep.
But deities and the supernatural aren't like that! People have talked a lot about them, but they have never produced one. I do not know of a single unequivocal appearance by a deity. Do you?
I've never seen stars spelling out "Repent" or the destruction of cities through purely supernatural means.
See what I'm getting at? Deities and the paranormal do not connect to reality. There is no version of the paranormal sheep that I can base a belief in such things on. All there is is talk, anecdotal evidence, and poorly conducted studies.
So please, show me the sheep!
by Thorby Baslim on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:42:35 PM PDT
assuming he exists, and said "Hi Thorby, I'm here and I'm real," you STILL would not conclude that there is a possibility. Instead you would conclude that you must be crazy, or are hallucinating for some reason.
by jkilkullen on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:49:12 PM PDT
Hallucinations are simpler and easier to explain than God appearing in front of me. Now, if he agreed to let me videotape him, and/or if he measurably changed something, and if I could bring in a third party to verify what I was seeing and measuring, then sure, I'll believe. But then it wouldn't be faith, so of course by Christian theology it wouldn't do me any good anyway. But I'd believe.
by kyril on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:57:10 PM PDT
and I expect the likelihood of him doing so exactly zero.
So thanks for the pep talk!
by Thorby Baslim on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:15:42 PM PDT
Not to be snippy, but if God appeared in front of Thorby, it would presumably be because he wanted Thorby to believe. So he could just snap his metaphorical fingers and make Thorby believe, boom, instead. Seems more efficient.
by Fred Fnord on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:23:29 PM PDT
I've always thought that if the big guy really existed, there'd be no atheists.
by Thorby Baslim on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:48:02 PM PDT
...your name is from just about the only Heinlein novel I ever really enjoyed. (Amusingly, a lot of it appears, if you read it with the right eye, to be an Andre Norton tribute.)
by Fred Fnord on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:51:58 PM PDT
since God exists because of faith, showing up and proving himself would be his annihilation and he would go "poof" in a puff of logic.
Then a lot of people would be extremely pissed...
The scientists would then proceed to prove black is white and get killed at the next zebra crossing...
or something of the sort to paraphrase Douglas Adams
by Jeffersonian Democrat on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 03:19:31 AM PDT
Nonetheless. Occam's Razor does not say "Where there is no evidence for the presence of multiple entities, unnecessarily multiplied entities do not exist", merely that "Where there is no evidence, you should not unnecessarily multiply entities".
A colleague of mine and I found an interesting phenomenon in a part of the brain of a certain kind of bird - well, to clarify: I found an interesting quirk of behavior that seems to correlate with the neural phenomenon. I could assume that thetans (just to be outrageous) were involved, but because thetans are totally unnecessary to explain things and because neural transmission is fairly well-studied (although much is not yet known about it), it makes more sense for us to assume that the phenomena we saw are merely the natural result of sexually selected brain circuits processing sound and producing behavior.
That doesn't mean that thetans aren't involved.
It means that I'm not going to write about thetans when I try to write up my results, because they are apparently irrelevant.
That's the key: apparently irrelevant. Spirits of all sorts, including deities, are apparently irrelevant to the phenomena we see around us. But we can't say for sure that they are really and truly irrelevant, just that we have as yet not seen any phenomena that could possibly involve the intervention of such spirits.
Now: I'm going to go off and live like an atheist, until the day I experience some form of gnosis. But I cannot say, with absolute certainty, that any gnosis I may experience is merely the result of neural misfirings. Obviously neural misfirings are the mechanism by which I might experience gnosis, but what causes them? Obviously, gross physiological disruption caused by drugs, or dehydration, or electrical shocks, can cause these experiences; yet sometimes they appear to happen without cause.
We could simply shrug and say, "Some things happen without cause." But I think that's a bit of a cop-out. Except for singularities, maybe, there's always a triggering event, whether we can see it or not. What is that event? You tell me. Alternately, are singularities rather common?
by Shaviv on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:40:53 PM PDT
called "Occam's miniseries" which posits that if there are many possible explanations of an event, the one that makes the best TV miniseries is the one that people will believe and remember. . . .
by zdefender on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 10:46:45 PM PDT
You have made my afternoon.
Good thing I wasn't drinking coffee, because I would have coughed it onto the keyboard.
Thanks. :3
by Shaviv on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 12:49:38 PM PDT
I have ever gotten :-) Thanks!
by zdefender on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 09:51:08 PM PDT
I happen to be a quite normal, educated, very rational, well-adjusted Christian woman who has a very REAL, personal, and deep relationship with Jesus Christ. I assure you I am quite sane. My relationship with God is just as real to me as any relationship I have. I absolutely believe in the supernatural, angels, demons, the works! I was raised in a Christian home, but I was an adult when I, of my own volition, chose to enter into a relationship with God. I've had very real encounters with both angels and demons. My belief is not a "lie" I've told myself - it's a truth that was revealed to me. I didn't seek it, it sought me. I don't feel the need to be rude to people for not believing as I do unless they personally attack me or my faith. I've questioned my faith numerous times. I've asked myself why I believe in God many, many times. There were years that I didn't live a Christian life at all. But at the end of the day, I can only say I believe because God has made himself real to me. And to me, that's as rational as anything else in this crazy world.
...Everything is permissable, but not all things are prudent ~ Apostle Paul
by angeleyes on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 06:26:00 AM PDT
to be all that militant about oceanstar17s rights - as they are already pretty aggressively defended is the point
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:33:10 PM PDT
oceanstar17's right to believe in The Flying Spaghetti Monster for all I care. Religion would be OK if they didn't persecute our rights, reputations and opportunities because of our atheist belief; and the present crisis in America would not exist if it were not for religious over-zealousness, both Christian and Muslim. I really like the philosophy expressed in the bumper sticker I recently placed on my own car: "Focus On Your Own Goddamned Family"!
GOD is not DEAD; HE is merely DEAF
by Roadrage on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:46:35 PM PDT
a new musical instrument
by ubertar on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:06:22 PM PDT
Christians and others "share their beliefs" but atheists push their beliefs on others and are therefore militant
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:14:40 PM PDT
side, and both are motivated by the same sense of supeiority and arrogance.I was raised Catholic and we were told NOT to preach at people and to let our lvies speak for themselves.
Sorry,. The fact that atheists are despised by the morans doesn't make atheist obnoxiousness understandable or acceptable. Instead it makes them sound remarkably like what they are opposing--and adolescent to boot.
WICCANS are despised also, and generally speaking, we don';t go around behaving badly--well,not if we're over 25 anyway; the ones who are the snarky assholes are usually young and very new to Wicca and oftenr ecovering from fundy religion--which, I suspect it also true of the obnxoiosu atheists. I apoloigize for their behavior as often as possible..
by irishwitch on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 11:32:12 AM PDT
when an atheist explains their beliefs they are usually accused of being obnoxious - yet these beliefs are constantly subject to widespread mischaracterization by the media and in every day life therefore need explaining
by ResponsibleAccountable on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 12:34:39 PM PDT
religious proselytizers are never obnoxious.
Intelligent Designer Laments Lapse in Intelligence
by mrblifil on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:23:37 PM PDT
...atheists when they have a spokesperson like Rob Sherman (and believe me, I know him, and he's very obnoxious)!
Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight.
by JeffW on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 01:58:44 PM PDT
He sure as heck doesn't speak for me.
That is one common mistake that people make - atheists are not part of an organized religion, with elected or selected leaders. Each is an individual, with individual ideas.
People with hatred in their hearts never live up to their full potential. It's very sad.
by Nelsons on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:21:38 PM PDT
when he makes another comment about "those people who post on Daily Kos." :-)
by jkilkullen on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 08:52:56 PM PDT
We are not a monolithic block. We don't even have a single universally shared belief. We range from "Knowing what we do about the universe, there can be no deities, supernatural beings or paranormal phenomena" to "There might be something out there, but it would be silly for me to believe in it without any evidence."
Some atheists are really more like Deists: "There's probably something out there beyond what we can perceive which we might as well label God since we don't know what it is, but it doesn't affect the things we can perceive in any measurable way so it might as well not exist."
So, since we have no doctrine, no church, no infallible book, no gathering place, no symbol, and no leader, it's absolutely ridiculous to hold us as a group accountable for things said by individuals. In fact, it's really kind of silly to speak of us as a group at all - speaking of which, fellow atheists of all stripes, forgive my hypocrisy in this comment, but I really am trying to be inclusive. I'm sure one of you will come correct me on something.
We tend to disagree on far more than we agree on, and many of us like arguing for the sake of arguing. Also, as a rule, we're fairly anti-authoritarian (whether this is a cause of atheism or a product of being atheist in an authoritarian-religious culture is up for debate) so when a self-proclaimed "leader," atheist or not, tries to speak for or about us as a group, we tend to reflexively start arguing (against him/her, each other, and anyone else who happens to get in our way).
by kyril on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 09:19:16 PM PDT
There are some some groups of atheists and agnostics organized around a belief in ethics and kindness.
One branch of Judaism is Humanistic Judaism---a nontheistic branch which bases its beliefs on promoting the well-being and dignity of all people. (national org= society for humanistic judaism). The basic belief is that changes in our lives and history are caused by the actions of people (not divine actions) and with that comes the responsibility to help others, be kind, ethical, etc because it's up to us to make the world a better place.
Ethical culture is another one.
Also--there are humanist organizations. Harvard has a Humanist Chaplaincy which has a great website.
by LisaLL on Wed Nov 28, 2007 at 03:28:06 AM PDT
[